The Unity of Kant’s Active Thinker
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Forces and causes in Kant’s early pre-Critical writings
This paper considers Kant’s conception of force and causality in his early pre-Critical writings, arguing that this conception is best understood by way of contrast with his immediate predecessors, such as Christian Wolff, Alexander Baumgarten, Georg Friedrich Meier, Martin Knutzen, and Christian August Crusius, and in terms of the scientific context of natural philosophy at the time. According...
متن کاملKant’s Reflections on the Unity of Consciousness, Time-Consciousness, and the Unconscious
n what follows, I shall address the question concerning the ultimate premise of the Transcendental Analytic in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. I believe the candidates can be reduced to two dominant but opposing principles, one grounded in immanent time-consciousness and the other in the unity of consciousness. In pursuing this goal, I intend to view consciousness through Leibnizian lenses by f...
متن کاملFrom school to university: unity of education system in Kant’s thought
Nowadays, the topics of the philosophy of education, in general, and the philosophy of university, in particular, are mainly focused on the details of the education system such as ethics, academic freedom, the relationship between education and developmental psychology and the like. This scenario, which is not unaffected by the prevailing discourse of recent decades, especially the discrediting...
متن کاملForthcoming in: Kantian Review 17.2 (2012) 1 What Does Kant Mean by ‘Power of Judgement’ in his Critique of the Power of Judgement?
The notion of ‘power of judgement’ in the title of Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement is commonly taken to refer to a cognitive power inclusive of both determining judgement and reflecting judgement. I argue, first, that this seemingly innocuous view is in conflict both with the textual fact that Kant attempts a critical justification of the reflecting power of judgement – only – and wit...
متن کاملA Deduction from Apperception?
I discuss three elements of Dennis Schulting’s new book on the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of the understanding, or categories. First, that Schulting gives a detailed account of the role of each individual category. Second, Schulting’s insistence that the categories nevertheless apply ‘en bloc’. Third, Schulting’s defence of Kant’s so-called reciprocity thesis that subjective ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011